Deets On Accelerationism - Part 2
Sections
Accelerationism
Left-wing accelerationism
Effective Accelerationism (E/Acc)
Twitter and Accelerationism
Catastrophe Accelerationism
The Manson Family and Accelerationism
Accelerationism and The Great Replacement Theory
Right-Wing Accelerationism and Extremism
January 6th
Trump
Tops Friendly Market Shooting
Highland Park Shooting
Accelerationism and Disinformation
Accelerationism and The GRU
Dangers of Accelerationism
Decelerating Accelerationism
Deets On Accelerationism Timeline
The Manson Family and Accelerationism
The Manson Family harbored a twisted desire for a race war, which they believed would lead to societal collapse and their eventual rise to power. Their leader, Charles Manson, propagated a warped ideology that combined elements of racism, apocalyptic thinking, and a longing for chaos.
Now, let’s delve into the unexpected connection with Accelerationism. While Accelerationism is a diverse and multifaceted concept, some proponents advocate for hastening the collapse of existing systems—be it capitalism, the state, or social norms. They believe that this collapse will pave the way for radical transformation and a new order. Here's a breakdown:
Similarities:
Rejection of existing systems: Both Accelerationism and The Manson Family held strong disdain for the prevailing social and political order. Accelerationists seek to intensify current crises to force a rapid collapse and rebirth of society, while Manson envisioned a race war and subsequent societal breakdown.
Violence as a tool: Both groups embraced violence as a means to achieve their goals. The Manson Family committed brutal murders, while some Accelerationist factions advocate for violent revolution or terrorism.
Cult-like tendencies: The Manson Family functioned as a tightly knit, hierarchical group with unwavering loyalty to Charles Manson. Some Accelerationist movements, particularly those leaning towards fascism or esotericism, exhibit similar cult-like dynamics.
Differences:
Motivation: Accelerationists generally aim for a transformative societal shift, often towards a more technologically advanced or radically egalitarian future. The Manson Family, on the other hand, was driven by a blend of paranoia, apocalyptic fantasies, and Manson's personal delusions of grandeur.
Scale and scope: Accelerationism encompasses a diverse range of ideologies and movements, while The Manson Family was a single, relatively small group.
Historical context: The Manson Family emerged in the late 1960s under the influence of countercultural movements and social anxieties of the time. Accelerationism, while having roots in earlier leftist and futurist thought, gained more prominence in the late 20th and early 21st centuries due to factors like globalization, technological advancements, and growing political polarization.
Important considerations:
Drawing direct parallels between the two is problematic: The Manson Family's actions were rooted in Manson's personal pathology and specific circumstances, while Accelerationism is a complex and multifaceted ideological movement. Conflating them risks oversimplification and mischaracterization.
Accelerationism is not inherently violent: While some factions advocate for violence, many promote non-violent means of accelerating social change.
It's crucial to avoid generalizations: Both Accelerationism and The Manson Family are diverse groups with varying degrees of radicalism and violence.
Here’s where the threads intersect: Charles Manson, influenced by accelerationist propaganda, saw infamy as a means to accelerate “the System’s” downfall. He believed that sparking a race war (which he termed “Helter Skelter”) would plunge society into chaos, leading to the collapse he desired. The Manson Family’s gruesome murders were intended to ignite this apocalyptic conflict.
In summary, both the Manson Family’s violent aspirations and certain strands of Accelerationism share a common thread: a belief that destabilization and upheaval can pave the way for radical change. However, it’s essential to recognize that Accelerationism is a broad umbrella, and not all adherents endorse violence or criminal acts like those perpetrated by the Manson Family.
Twitter and Accelerationism
Twitter's connection to accelerationism is a complex and multifaceted issue, requiring careful analysis of its platform's role in facilitating the movement's dissemination and evolution. Here's a breakdown of potential connections:
Amplifying accelerationist voices:
Twitter Spaces: Features like Twitter Spaces have offered spaces for accelerationist groups to host discussions and attract new followers, contributing to their online presence and influence.
Hashtags: Specific hashtags associated with accelerationist strands, like #e/acc, can act as rallying points and facilitate information sharing within the movement's online communities.
Prominent figures: Some accelerationist proponents with large Twitter followings, like Nick Land and Peter Thiel, use the platform to disseminate their ideas and engage with audiences, potentially normalizing their views for some users.
Challenges and concerns:
Echo chambers and radicalization: Twitter's algorithm can create echo chambers for existing accelerationist communities, potentially contributing to radicalization and the spread of extreme views.
Harassment and hate speech: Accelerationist rhetoric can be inflammatory and promote discriminatory or hateful content. Twitter's struggle to effectively address these issues creates concerns about the platform's role in normalizing or amplifying harmful narratives.
Platform control and moderation: The extent to which Twitter proactively identifies and moderates accelerationist content is a point of ongoing debate. Critics argue that inconsistent policies or weak enforcement embolden these communities.
Potential benefits and counter-narratives:
Open conversation and critique: Twitter can also facilitate open debate and critique of accelerationist ideas, offering space for counter-narratives and potentially preventing echo chambers.
Monitoring and research: Researchers and journalists can use Twitter to monitor accelerationist online discourse, providing valuable insights into the movement's dynamics and potential threats.
Community building and alternative narratives: Users can also leverage Twitter to build communities based on alternative visions of technological and social progress, offering counterpoints to accelerationist narratives.
Conclusion:
Twitter's relationship with accelerationism is complex and evolving. While the platform provides opportunities for the movement's dissemination and amplification, it also offers potential for critical dialogue, research, and community building around responsible technological advancement. Understanding the platform's role in both facilitating and challenging accelerationist narratives is crucial for engaging in informed discussions about its potential impact on society.
See:
Accelerationism and The Great Replacement Theory
Accelerationism and the Great Replacement theory are distinct concepts, but there can be overlaps or associations in certain ideological circles.
Accelerationism
Focus on Systemic Failure: Accelerationism generally revolves around the idea of exacerbating systemic flaws or societal contradictions to hasten the collapse of existing structures, with the anticipation that this collapse will lead to radical societal change.
Various Ideological Strands: It encompasses both left-wing and right-wing variants, each with different goals and perspectives on how societal transformation should occur.
Great Replacement Theory
Ethno-Nationalist Beliefs: The Great Replacement theory is a far-right conspiracy theory suggesting that majority populations in Western countries are being replaced by non-European immigrants, often due to deliberate actions or schemes orchestrated by certain groups.
Racial and Cultural Concerns: It revolves around concerns regarding demographic changes and the perceived erosion of traditional cultural values, largely fueled by fears of demographic shifts.
Possible Connections
Alignment in Extreme Right-Wing Circles: In some instances, individuals or groups subscribing to extreme right-wing ideologies might advocate for both accelerationist strategies (particularly right-wing accelerationism) and the Great Replacement theory.
Desire for Societal Upheaval: Both concepts, albeit with different emphases, envision significant societal changes. While the Great Replacement theory focuses on demographic shifts, accelerationism seeks broader systemic changes.
Different Perspectives
Ethical and Ideological Variations: Accelerationism, even in its right-wing form, isn't inherently focused on demographic issues but rather on systemic change. The Great Replacement theory, on the other hand, emphasizes demographic concerns and ethno-nationalist narratives.
Conclusion
While there might be overlaps in certain ideological circles or among individuals who hold extreme right-wing views, accelerationism and the Great Replacement theory are distinct concepts with different primary focuses and ideological underpinnings. It's important to approach discussions on these topics with an understanding of their complexities and the potential for differing interpretations within various ideological frameworks.
See:
Right-Wing Accelerationism and Extremism
Right-wing accelerationism shares some commonalities with its left-wing counterpart in the sense that it seeks to exploit societal tensions and accelerate the collapse of the existing system. However, it does so with a distinct focus on advancing far-right or supremacist agendas.
The ideology often promotes the acceleration of societal chaos, aiming to provoke or expedite a breakdown of the current social and political order. This breakdown is envisioned as a means to establish an ethno-nationalist or supremacist society, often through violent and extremist means.
Connections to Domestic Terrorism
In recent years, analysts and security experts have observed a rise in right-wing extremism and its links to acts of domestic terrorism. Some instances of violence have been attributed to individuals or groups influenced by or aligned with right-wing accelerationist ideologies.
Individuals driven by these beliefs might seek to instigate or exacerbate societal tensions, viewing acts of violence or terrorism as a means to destabilize the existing order. Their goal may involve sparking a race war, ethnic conflict, or other societal upheavals that they believe will pave the way for their envisioned supremacist society.
The Boogaloo Boys
The Boogaloo movement, often referred to as the Boogaloo Boys or Boogaloo Bois, is a loosely organized, anti-government, and anti-authoritarian movement that gained attention for its members' presence at protests and their advocacy for a second American Civil War, which they often refer to as the "boogaloo."
The connection between accelerationism and the Boogaloo movement is somewhat complex.
Accelerationism and Boogaloo Ideologies
Anti-Government Stance: Both accelerationism and the Boogaloo movement share an anti-establishment sentiment. Accelerationism, in its various forms, advocates for exacerbating societal tensions or system failures to prompt radical change. The Boogaloo movement, similarly, rejects government authority and aims for a collapse of the current system.
Embracing Chaos: Accelerationism, particularly its more extreme forms, sees chaos and societal breakdown as necessary precursors for the creation of a new and improved system. While the Boogaloo movement doesn’t explicitly align with accelerationist theory, some members advocate for societal unrest or a civil war as a means to dismantle existing structures.
Ethno-Nationalist Tendencies: Some branches of accelerationism have ties to white supremacist or ethno-nationalist beliefs. While not all members of the Boogaloo movement hold these views, there have been instances of individuals associated with the movement expressing racist or extremist ideologies.
Divergences and Distinctions
However, it's important to note several significant differences between accelerationism and the Boogaloo movement:
Differing Goals: Accelerationism, in its left-wing form, aims to accelerate societal contradictions to hasten the collapse of capitalism for a more equitable system. The Boogaloo movement, on the other hand, seeks to incite a civil conflict to challenge government authority without necessarily advocating for a specific alternative system.
Varied Philosophical Roots: Accelerationism has roots in philosophical and economic theories, while the Boogaloo movement's ideology is more influenced by anti-government sentiments, gun rights advocacy, and a desire for societal upheaval.
Controversies and Societal Impact
The Boogaloo movement has faced scrutiny and has been associated with instances of violence and domestic terrorism. While not explicitly an accelerationist movement, some individuals within the Boogaloo movement might hold accelerationist views or sympathize with accelerationist ideologies.
The connections between accelerationism and the Boogaloo movement primarily lie in their anti-establishment and anti-government outlooks, as well as a shared inclination toward societal unrest. However, it's crucial to understand that the Boogaloo movement is diverse and decentralized, encompassing individuals with varying beliefs and motivations.
See:
January 6th
The events of January 6th, 2021, when a mob breached the United States Capitol, were driven by a combination of various factors, including political grievances, false narratives about election fraud, and extremist ideologies. While there isn’t direct evidence linking the attack to a specific accelerationist movement, certain parallels and ideological overlaps can be observed.
Accelerationist Elements and January 6th
Anti-Government Sentiment: Accelerationism, particularly in its extreme forms, fosters anti-government sentiments. The individuals involved in the Capitol breach expressed discontent with the government's perceived failure to address their grievances, echoing sentiments of systemic failure.
Desire for Upheaval: Some accelerationist ideologies, including elements of right-wing accelerationism, emphasize the idea of exploiting existing societal tensions to prompt a breakdown of the system. The chaos witnessed on January 6th aligns with the notion of destabilizing the status quo to bring about radical change.
Conspiracy Narratives: Accelerationism often thrives on narratives of impending collapse or societal decay. The false narrative of election fraud, propagated by some individuals associated with the Capitol breach, could be seen as a belief in a systemic failure that needs to be accelerated for change to occur.
Distinguishing Factors
It's crucial to note that while certain aspects of accelerationism might intersect with the motivations or ideologies of some individuals involved in the Capitol breach, it’s not accurate to solely attribute the events to accelerationism:
Diverse Motivations: The individuals involved in the January 6th attack had diverse motivations, ranging from a belief in election fraud to fervent support for a particular political figure. Not all participants necessarily subscribed to accelerationist ideologies.
Political Context: The attack was largely fueled by false narratives about election fraud and fueled by political rhetoric. While some accelerationist ideologies might align with the desire for societal upheaval, the attack was a culmination of various factors beyond accelerationism.
Impact and Societal Response
The events of January 6th raised concerns about the rise of extremism, the spread of misinformation, and the potential for political violence. While accelerationism may not have been the sole driving force, the incident underscores the need for a thorough examination of radical ideologies, the impact of false narratives, and the vulnerabilities within society that can be exploited by extremist groups or individuals.
Understanding the various ideologies, including accelerationism, that intersect with or influence extremist actions is essential for devising effective strategies to counter radicalization, prevent violent incidents, and safeguard democratic institutions.
See:
Trump
The connections between accelerationism and Donald Trump, the former President of the United States, are complex and multifaceted, reflecting a convergence of political, social, and ideological factors. While Trump himself may not explicitly align with accelerationist theories, several elements in his presidency and the broader political climate intersect with certain aspects of accelerationist thought:
Discontent with Establishment
Anti-Establishment Rhetoric: Trump's political rise was fueled by an anti-establishment sentiment. He positioned himself as an outsider, critiquing traditional politicians and promising to disrupt the status quo, resonating with some who were disillusioned with mainstream politics.
Challenges to the System: Accelerationism, in its various forms, seeks to challenge or destabilize existing systems. Trump's confrontational approach toward established norms, institutions, and political correctness echoed this desire to disrupt the status quo.
Societal Division and Disruption
Polarizing Leadership: Trump's leadership style and rhetoric often exacerbated societal divisions. Accelerationist theories thrive on societal tensions and conflicts, and Trump's presidency was marked by polarizing rhetoric that deepened societal divides.
Heightened Political Turbulence: Accelerationism, particularly in its more extreme forms, anticipates societal chaos as a precursor to systemic change. The tumultuous nature of Trump's presidency and the political climate during his tenure contributed to a sense of societal unrest.
Political Impact and Reaction
Radicalization and Extremism: Trump's presidency coincided with a period of heightened political polarization, leading to increased radicalization on both ends of the political spectrum. Some individuals who embraced accelerationist ideologies found elements within Trump's rhetoric or actions that aligned with their desires for societal upheaval.
Role in Disinformation: Accelerationism thrives on narratives of systemic failure or impending collapse. Trump's propagation of misinformation, particularly regarding the 2020 election results, contributed to a narrative of a flawed system that could align with certain accelerationist beliefs.
Conclusion
The connections between accelerationism and Trump's presidency are indirect and nuanced. While Trump's rhetoric and approach to governance might have resonated with some aspects of accelerationist thought, attributing direct alignment between Trump and accelerationism would oversimplify the complexities of both phenomena.
Trump's presidency and the political climate during his tenure intersected with various ideologies and sentiments within society, including elements that could resonate with certain aspects of accelerationist theories. However, it's crucial to analyze these connections with nuance and to consider the broader socio-political context rather than implying a direct causal relationship.
See: