Church of Deets - Jesus On Abortion | Part 2 - Forced Birth History
Deets On Christian Nationalism
Church of Deets - Jesus On Abortion | Part 2 - Forced Birth History
Christians weren’t always anti-abortion. The Nation detailed in the article "Agent of Intolerance" by Michael Kazin discusses the controversial legacy of Jerry Falwell, a prominent American evangelical minister who passed away in 2007. The author explores Falwell's history of promoting segregation and opposing abortion, as well as his influence on conservative politics in the United States.
The article notes that Falwell began his career as a segregationist, opposing the Civil Rights movement and supporting racial segregation in churches and other institutions. The author argues that Falwell's views on race were rooted in his conservative interpretation of Christianity, which he saw as incompatible with racial integration and equality.
The article also discusses Falwell's opposition to abortion, which he saw as a moral issue rather than a political one. The author notes that Falwell's opposition to abortion was a key factor in his rise to prominence in the conservative movement, and that his views on the issue helped to shape the political landscape in the United States.
Overall, the article argues that Falwell's legacy is one of intolerance and exclusion, both in his views on race and his opposition to abortion. The author suggests that Falwell's influence on conservative politics in the United States continues to be felt today, and that his legacy raises important questions about the relationship between religion and politics in American society.
Reagan became an anti-abortion champion, in April 1980 The Washington Post article "Reagan Is Favored by Anti-Abortionists" by David Hoffman discusses the 1980 presidential election and the role of the abortion issue in shaping the campaign. The article notes that many anti-abortion activists had thrown their support behind Republican candidate Ronald Reagan, seeing him as a strong advocate for their cause.
Agent of Intolerance - The Nation May 16, 2007
The article describes the views of several anti-abortion leaders, who argue that the issue is a crucial one for voters and that Reagan's position on abortion makes him the best candidate for those who oppose the practice. These leaders suggest that Reagan's election would lead to significant changes in abortion policy, including the possible overturning of the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.
The article also notes that Reagan's position on abortion was not always clear-cut, and that he had faced criticism from some anti-abortion activists for not being forceful enough in his opposition to the practice. However, the article suggests that many anti-abortion activists saw Reagan as the best hope for their cause, and that his candidacy had energized their movement.
Overall, the article highlights the role of the abortion issue in shaping the 1980 presidential election and the support of anti-abortion activists for Ronald Reagan. The article suggests that the abortion issue was a significant factor in the election, and that Reagan's position on the issue played a key role in his success.
By 1992, Abortion became a core election issue, due to the growing influence of early Christian Nationalists. According to The Christian Science Monitor article from December 1991 titled The article "The Bible and the Ballot Box in 1992" by Daniel Schorr discusses the role of religion in American politics leading up to the 1992 presidential election. The author notes that many Americans see the election as a "spiritual struggle" between the forces of good and evil, with candidates' religious beliefs and moral values playing a key role in shaping voters' decisions.
Reagan Is Favored by Anti-Abortionists - The Washington Post April 12, 1980
The article explores the views of several prominent religious leaders, including conservative Christian evangelist Pat Robertson and civil rights leader Jesse Jackson. These leaders represent different ends of the political spectrum, but both see the election as a crucial opportunity to advance their respective agendas.
The article also notes the growing influence of conservative Christian groups in American politics, particularly around issues like abortion and same-sex marriage. The author suggests that these groups have been successful in mobilizing voters around these issues, and that their influence is likely to continue in future elections.
Overall, the article highlights the importance of religion in American politics and the role of religious leaders in shaping the political landscape. The author suggests that the 1992 presidential election is likely to be a pivotal moment in this ongoing struggle, with the outcome of the election having far-reaching consequences for the direction of the country.
In the article "The Family Values Thing," writer David Ignatius discusses the role of family values in American politics leading up to the 1992 presidential election. Ignatius notes that both major parties are trying to appeal to voters' concerns about the state of the American family, with Republicans emphasizing traditional family values and Democrats focusing on economic policies to support families. The article notes that Republicans had long opposed abortion and sought to restrict access to it, while Democrats supported a woman's right to choose and sought to protect and expand access to abortion services.
The Bible and the Ballot Box in 1992 - The Christian Science Monitor December 30, 1991
The article explores the views of several prominent political figures on the issue of family values, including Republican vice presidential nominee Dan Quayle and Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton. Quayle has been a vocal advocate for traditional family values, arguing that they are essential to the health of American society. Clinton, on the other hand, has emphasized the importance of economic policies that support families, such as paid family leave and affordable child care.
The article also notes the controversy over Quayle's comments about the TV character Murphy Brown, whom he criticized for having a child out of wedlock. Ignatius suggests that Quayle's comments reflect a larger cultural divide between those who emphasize traditional family values and those who see family structures as more fluid and varied.
Overall, the article highlights the importance of the family values issue in American politics and the different ways that politicians are trying to appeal to voters on this issue. The author suggests that the issue is likely to continue to play a key role in future elections, as Americans grapple with the changing nature of family structures and the challenges facing families in an increasingly complex world.
By September 2010, The Tea Party had picked up the Moral Majority’s banner. In "Tea Party Values," Katha Pollitt explores the role of social issues, particularly reproductive rights and LGBT rights, in the Tea Party movement. Pollitt notes that while the Tea Party is often portrayed as a movement focused solely on smaller government and lower taxes, many of its candidates are outspoken opponents of abortion and same-sex marriage.
THE FAMILY VALUES THING | Opinion - The Washington Post August 16, 1992
"Donald J. Trump delivers remarks at the Liberty University commencement ceremony" under public domain by Shealah Craighead and the Executive Office of the President of the United States.
Pollitt argues that the Tea Party's social agenda is part of a broader cultural conservatism that seeks to preserve traditional gender roles and family structures. She suggests that the Tea Party's opposition to reproductive rights and LGBT rights reflects a broader attempt to roll back progressive gains in these areas.
The article notes that many Tea Party candidates have sought to restrict access to abortion services and overturn Roe v. Wade, despite the fact that a majority of Americans support a woman's right to choose. Pollitt suggests that the Tea Party's focus on abortion reflects a larger effort to limit women's autonomy and preserve traditional gender roles.
Similarly, the article explores the Tea Party's opposition to same-sex marriage and other LGBT rights initiatives. Pollitt argues that the Tea Party's position on these issues is part of a broader effort to uphold traditional family structures and preserve gender roles. She suggests that the Tea Party's opposition to LGBT rights reflects a broader cultural conservatism that seeks to maintain a narrow and exclusionary definition of the American family.
Overall, the article suggests that the Tea Party's social agenda is part of a larger effort to roll back progressive gains in areas like reproductive rights and LGBT rights. The author argues that these efforts are out of step with the values of most Americans, who support equal rights and access to healthcare for all, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation.
Early childhood religious indoctrination inhibits critical thinking skills. Huffington Post points out in the article "Children Exposed To Religion Have Difficulty Distinguishing Fact From Fiction, Study Finds" discusses the results of a study that suggests children who are exposed to religion may have more difficulty distinguishing fact from fiction than children who are not exposed to religion. The study, conducted by researchers at Boston University and published in the journal Cognitive Science, involved a series of experiments with children between the ages of five and six.
Tea Party Values - The Nation September 21, 2010
The experiments involved presenting children with stories that included both factual information and fictional information. The children were then asked to distinguish between the two types of information. The study found that children who were exposed to religion were less able to distinguish between fact and fiction than children who were not exposed to religion.
The article notes that the study has generated controversy, with some critics suggesting that the study may be biased against religion. However, the researchers argue that the study is not intended to be a critique of religion, but rather a study of cognitive development and how exposure to different types of information can affect children's ability to distinguish between fact and fiction.
Overall, the article suggests that the study's findings are significant because they suggest that exposure to religion may have an impact on children's cognitive development and their ability to think critically. The article also notes that the study is likely to generate further research and debate on the role of religion in children's development and education.
We’ve seen Nationalists ban reproductive health and women’s rights before. Anne Wingenter via WBUR reports in "What Happens to Women's Rights When Democracy Backslides," journalist Ana Swanson explores the impact of declining democracies on women's rights. The article notes that in recent years, many democracies around the world have experienced backsliding, with governments becoming more authoritarian and less responsive to the needs of their citizens.
Children Exposed To Religion Have Difficulty Distinguishing Fact From Fiction, Study Finds - Huffington Post July 21, 2014
Swanson argues that women are often the first to feel the effects of democratic backsliding, as they are disproportionately affected by restrictions on civil liberties, curbs on freedom of expression, and increased political polarization. The article notes that in many countries, women's rights have been eroded by conservative and religious groups that seek to impose strict gender norms and restrict women's access to healthcare and education.
The article explores several case studies of democratic backsliding and its impact on women's rights, including in Turkey, Poland, and the United States. In Turkey, Swanson notes, President Erdogan has sought to roll back the gains made by women in recent decades, promoting a conservative vision of gender roles and restricting women's access to reproductive healthcare.
Similarly, in Poland, the ruling party has sought to restrict women's access to abortion and other reproductive healthcare services, sparking protests and demonstrations across the country. Swanson notes that these efforts to roll back women's rights have been accompanied by a broader crackdown on civil society and democratic institutions.
Finally, the article explores the impact of democratic backsliding on women's rights in the United States, noting that the rise of the far right and the erosion of democratic norms has created an increasingly hostile environment for women and other marginalized groups. Swanson suggests that the best way to protect women's rights in the face of democratic backsliding is to support civil society and democratic institutions, promote gender equality and women's empowerment, and strengthen international norms and standards around human rights and gender equality.
Newsweek reported that Gloria Steinem stated in "Tucker Carlson Slams Gloria Steinem for Hitler Comparison to Texas Abortion Law," journalist Darragh Roche discusses the controversy that arose when feminist icon Gloria Steinem compared the Texas abortion law to Hitler's rise to power in Germany. The article notes that Steinem made the comments during an appearance on MSNBC's "The ReidOut," arguing that the Texas law represented an assault on women's rights and a threat to democracy.
What happens to women's rights when democracy backslides - wbur NPR April 26, 2022
The article goes on to discuss the response to Steinem's comments, noting that Fox News host Tucker Carlson criticized her remarks on his show, calling them "obscene" and accusing her of engaging in hyperbole and fear-mongering. The article notes that Carlson and other conservative commentators have been vocal in their support of the Texas abortion law, arguing that it represents a victory for the pro-life movement and a step towards greater protection for the unborn.
The article explores the broader debate around abortion rights in the United States, noting that the Texas law is just one of many recent efforts by conservative lawmakers to restrict women's access to reproductive healthcare. The article notes that these efforts have been met with widespread resistance and protests, with many women and reproductive rights advocates calling for greater protection for women's reproductive rights and the right to choose.
Finally, the article notes that the controversy surrounding Steinem's comments is indicative of the deep divisions in American society around issues of gender, sexuality, and reproductive healthcare. The article suggests that these divisions are likely to persist in the coming years, as political polarization and cultural clashes continue to shape public discourse around issues of women's rights and reproductive healthcare.
Tucker Carlson Slams Gloria Steinem for Hitler Comparison to Texas Abortion Law - Newsweek October 2, 2021
And the overturning of Roe in the United States prompted Germany to abolish the Nazi-era law which banned abortions. Reuters reported in "Germany abolishes Nazi-era abortion law," Reuters reports that Germany has officially repealed a law that was enacted by the Nazi regime in 1933, which prohibited doctors from providing abortions and made it a criminal offense. The article notes that the law has long been criticized by human rights groups and women's rights advocates, who argued that it was a relic of a dark period in German history and had no place in modern society.
The article goes on to discuss the broader debate around abortion rights in Germany, noting that the country has been slow to adopt progressive reforms and has lagged behind many other European nations in terms of reproductive healthcare. The article notes that the repeal of the Nazi-era law is a significant step forward for women's rights in Germany, but that there is still much work to be done to ensure that women have access to safe and affordable reproductive healthcare.
Finally, the article notes that the repeal of the Nazi-era abortion law is part of a broader trend towards greater protection for women's reproductive rights and the right to choose. The article suggests that this trend is likely to continue in the coming years, as more and more countries recognize the importance of ensuring that women have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and their own lives.
Germany abolishes Nazi-era abortion law - Reuters June 24, 2022
Written with ChatGPT on March 28, 2023